A Significant Shift: Understanding Motion 14.3 and Its Impact on the Anglican Diocese of Perth

In a landmark decision, the Anglican Diocese of Perth’s Synod has passed Motion 14.3, amending the Code of Conduct known as Faithfulness in Service (FIS). This move, articulated in a circular by Archbishop Kay Goldsworthy, represents a crucial evolution in the Church's stance on sexual conduct and relationships within its community.

Context of the Amendments

The amendments to the FIS aim to redefine the framework surrounding sexual behavior in the Church. The key changes include:

Removal of Chastity Language: The phrase “by maintaining chastity in singleness and faithfulness in marriage” will be removed from section 7.2, signalling a departure from traditional definitions of sexual ethics.

Revised Conduct Expectations: Section 7.4 will now state, “Your sexual behaviour should be characterised by faithfulness and integrity,” replacing the previous directive that emphasised chastity.

Clarity in Breach of Conduct: The language in section 7.7 will be streamlined to focus on breaches of conduct, enhancing clarity and accountability.

These revisions reflect a broader conversation within the Anglican Church of Australia about addressing sexual ethics in a contemporary context while upholding core values of faithfulness and integrity.

Archbishop Goldsworthy’s Perspective

In her communication, Archbishop Goldsworthy emphasised the nature of the Code of Conduct as a living document, open to amendments over time. She noted that such changes are not uncommon across various dioceses, citing several examples of dioceses that have adopted different iterations of the FIS.

The Archbishop’s assent to the motion indicates her support for the Synod's majority, which demonstrated strong backing for the amendments:

House of Laity: 68% in favor

House of Clergy: 57% in favor

Overall: 64% in favor

This broad support underscores a collective willingness within the Church to engage in meaningful dialogue about sexual ethics and their application.

Implications for Same-Sex Partnerships

The amendments to the Faithfulness in Service document indeed have implications for the conversation around same-sex partnerships for clergy. Historically, the clauses concerning chastity and sexual conduct have been used by conservative factions to argue against the acceptance of same-sex relationships within the clergy.

Key Points on the Amendments and Their Implications:

Removal of Chastity Language: The deletion of phrases regarding maintaining chastity in singleness and faithfulness in marriage opens up a space for reinterpreting sexual ethics. This could potentially allow for a more inclusive understanding of relationships, including same-sex partnerships.

Revised Conduct Expectations: The new language emphasises that sexual behaviour should be characterised by "faithfulness and integrity" rather than strict adherence to traditional definitions of chastity. This shift might challenge conservative interpretations that restrict clergy to heterosexual relationships only.

Broader Interpretation of Relationships: The amendments suggest that faithfulness encompasses more than just sexual fidelity; it includes emotional and relational integrity, which can apply to same-sex relationships.

Speaking to Conservative Concerns:

Historical Context: The previous clauses have upheld a specific view of sexual ethics that does not reflect the evolving understanding of relationships in contemporary society. The amendments signal a move towards inclusivity and recognition of diverse relationships.

Integrity and Faithfulness: The revised language focuses on the qualities of integrity and faithfulness, applicable to all relationships, regardless of sexual orientation. This challenges the notion that only heterosexual relationships can embody these qualities.

Engaging in Dialogue: Ongoing conversations within the Church about the meaning of faithfulness are crucial, especially in relation to the lives of all members, including those in same-sex partnerships. Encouraging a spirit of openness and reflection is essential to navigate traditionalist views that may no longer resonate with many congregants.

Conclusion

The amendments to the Faithfulness in Service document create a significant opportunity to revisit the conversation around same-sex partnerships for clergy. By focusing on integrity and faithfulness, the Church can move toward a more inclusive understanding of relationships, aligning with a growing recognition of LGBTQ+ individuals within faith communities.

Engaging with both conservative and progressive voices in this discussion is essential to navigate these changes thoughtfully and respectfully. The passage of Motion 14.3 marks a pivotal moment for the Anglican Diocese of Perth as it addresses modern ethical standards within a faith context, inviting all members to participate in the ongoing dialogue. As we move forward, may we all be guided by principles of love, respect, and authenticity in our relationships, both within the Church and beyond.